Here is the whole article. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00658/full
In the MPA framework, PGMs are used to
generate two Overall Factors—Assertion and Perspective—that together represent
a signature decision-making style. The core idea is that individuals have a
need to balance their actions/motivations devoted to exerting tangible energy
in the environment in relation to pressure, time and attention focus to get
results (Assertion), vs shaping the body (with respect to the cardinal
planes of three-dimensional space—horizontal, vertical, and sagittal) to
position oneself to receive from the environment information to create the
result (Perspective). Differences in how individuals achieve their own balance
between the complementary processes of Assertion and Perspective are proposed
to capture different decision-making styles. For example, individuals high on
Assertion may employ a mindset of “nothing happens unless I make it happen.”
They rely upon decision-making motivations that include intensively focusing to
probe and classify information, applying pressure to support determination, and
pacing time to implement a decision at just the right moment. In contrast,
individuals high on Perspective are more strategic and get results by
positioning themselves. They are receptive to a broad scope of ideas and
information alternatives—they shape their bodily position to reflect on the
decision's relative value or priority and use movements to strategically
anticipate the stages of decision implementation to achieve an overall outcome
