https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kamala-harriss-mike-pences-debate-033108477.html
Kamala Harris's and Mike Pence's Debate Body Language, Decoded by an Expert
Body Language is the Vice Presidential Debates. Here is Why Kamala Harris is Smiling and Shaking Her Head by Body Language Expert Patti Wood
Here is why Harris's is smiling during in the debates when Pence interrupts, goes over time and makes false statements.
I said in my pre-debate interviews to watch for her smiles. It's fascinating that she is using smiles to respond to Pence when he is giving false information. Smiling and shaking her head and in disbelief are the softest ways for her to respond. For those viewers who were expecting her to look angry, they are seeing her maintain her calm. As the debates have gone
.
Research shows that we love candidates with a broad emotional range. We love someone who laughs and smiles big and warmly. We tend to like to know what someone is really feeling, and 4.3 times the message's impact is sent nonverbally. We remember what people say when they express it with true emotion.
I was asked about what is described by others as Pences "Stoniness." Pence baseline doesn't show a lot of changes based on any particular topic. He simply doesn't have much emotion. He rarely smiles and if he does it is not a full smile that goes up through his face, lifts his cheeks and crinkles around the eyes into a Duchenne smile and never brings his voice above a restrained, bedtime story rough whisper, and his lack of "Affect", (facial expressions) or at most minimalist facial expressions, can make viewers feel uncomfortable or it can make them feel soothed. But in either case, research on persuasion and retention say a lack of emotion also means people will have a hard time remembering what he actually said.
Harris and Pence are both smirking tonight.
Harris is doing a good job of showing vocal and facial variation. She is particularly potent when she tells stories of loss. Her voice became so deeply tender and emotional as she speaks to the mother her lost her son. She doesn't rush through. She shows and sounds the emotion of loss and grief. .
When Pence got to the Braina Taylor story he rushed through the story of loss and actually did bring up his voice as he talked about the rioting and looting. He showed real anger towards the looting and rioting and destruction of property. I believed him in that moment. I keep a chart of nonverbal behaviors as I analyze the debates and this section got a triple check. His voice became louder and stronger and he moved forward. It was the most emotion he showed so far in the debates.
What do look for in the Harris, Pence Vice Presidential Debates tonight. Body Language In Tonight's Debates, Body Language Expert Patti Wood
Alex,
At the
top of the debates.
The
Candidate's energy and dynamism coming out on stage before they take their
seats and their animation and energy throughout the debates will be among the
most critical factors to determine who we see as "wining" the
debates.
Energy impacted our perceptions of who looked powerful in the Biden Trump presidential debates. We are also looking at Pence's to see if he looks energetic and healthy and Harris to see if she fears getting COVID 19 from Pence. Because some viewed Trump as "out of control" in the presidential debates will be looking for each candidate's self-control as well.
We also
want to see if she can give some of her energy to her ticket in the pairing
with Biden's calmer low-key energy on the Democratic ticket. I will share more later about first
impressions later in these notes.
The Safety of the Stage for Covid 19 transmission in the Vice Presidential Debates between Harris and Pence.
Looking at the photo of the stage for tonight's Vice Presidential Debates, I would say it doesn't seem safe for protection from aerosol transmission based on the research I have read and the aerosol transmission experts I've consulted. I consult with various experts as I advise my clients on safely interacting above the mask and or at a distance.
If you look at the photo, all the people setting it up are wearing masks. It's stunning to see even those sitting in the chairs briefly pretending to be the candidates are taking more precautions that the real live debaters will be.
So, I think the audience needs to think of how they would feel to be that close for that long with someone who has had exposure to several people who have tested positive.
So,
Harris will have a factor of danger and fear that Pence will not have to deal
with in the debates. That is a great
advantage for him. So, will she look scared? Will her body freeze or pull away,
especially if Pence makes it a point to lean in and speak loudly and open his
mouth wide?
Study
Pence's expressions. Especially his smile. Will he smile in a friendly, warm
manner, or will he show enjoyment at making Harris feel like she is risking her
health and Biden's health. He can sometimes offer a smirky smile or pleasure
when he feels superior and may not play well, considering the circumstances.
Kamala also smirks and glares when she
feels she has achieved a "gotcha" moment, but if Pence starts the
smirk debates, we will know that he thinks he began with the upper hand because
she agreed to debate with this potentially risky room set up.
I train and consult on negotiations, and
I give them the insight that at times, the location, table, and who sits where
and who starts before the talks are gaining competitive advantage before the
actual face to face negotiations. As in, She gave on this and this so we know
we have an advantage going in"
Some may be old enough to remember the seemly
never-ending negotiations about the table shape in the Paris Peace accords as
the U.S. left Vietnam. (One of the largest hurdles to effective negotiation was the
fact that North Vietnam and the National Front for the Liberation of South
Vietnam (NLF, or Viet Cong) in the
South, refused to recognize the government of South Vietnam; with equal
persistence, the government in Saigon refused to acknowledge the
legitimacy of the NLF. Harriman resolved this dispute by developing a system by
which North Vietnam and U.S. would be the named parties; NLF officials could
join the North Vietnam team without being recognized by South Vietnam, while
Saigon's representatives joined their U.S. allies.
A similar debate concerned the shape of the table to be
used at the conference. The North favored a circular table, in which all
parties, including NLF representatives, would appear to be "equal"'
in importance. The South Vietnamese argued that only a rectangular table was
acceptable, for only a rectangle could show two distinct sides to the conflict.
Eventually, a compromise was reached, in which representatives of the northern
and southern governments would sit at a circular table, with members
representing all other parties sitting at individual square tables around them.)
Pence
required the desks so both candidates could be seated. It a novel choice for
debates this close to the election.
Audiences will be looking at this choice. We are all wondering about
that choice as he usually would have a height advantage that would make him
look stronger and more alpha. Is
choosing the desks to cancel that noticeable difference, so it allows him to be
more aggressive in his delivery without looking like a bully? Gender
differences and stereotypes will play a role in these debates. Pence does not want to come across as mean,
but he already does to a degree by forcing an in-person debate when he puts her
at risk. Will he push more or less because of that?
Some may conjecture that he insisted on being seated because he does have
COVID, and he needs to stay seated because of that illness. But it could also
be a way of "softening" his masculine (power height) advantage
We are
typically attracted to broad emotional range in our candidates, we find a
candidate that can laugh and smile and be calm and powerful and angry as more
dynamic and energetic and more entertaining to watch.
Energy was a big difference in the Bident Trump debates and difference in energy and dynamism will be something we are
looking for here. Our limbic brain believes that the more energetic alpha
candidate makes the best leader, and the alpha candidate is often seen as
winning the debates. In fact in debate research audiences often determine who
they think is the "winner" in a fraction of second of seeing the
candidates on stage together before the debates have started based on the
nonverbal charismatic factors of Likeability Attractiveness and Power without
noting the forth of those four first impression factors Credibility.
Looking
at each of the candidates' smiles as smiling can make someone more attractive,
appear more approachable and less dominant, and are interpreted differently
based on gender. If Harris doesn't smile (a happy, sincere smile), voters may
see her as aggressive and less attractive.
(higher
intellectual and social abilities were attributed to individuals with esthetic
smiles. They were also judged to be more attractive than the same individuals
on photographs) (Previous research has
found that smiling is associated with attractiveness in women, but dominance in
men. These are probably a result of gender stereotypes. One finding in the
present study was that women's smiles were judged less authentic than men.
Krumhuber et al. (2007) speculate that this is because women tend to smile more
than men, so their behavior is seen as more usual and, therefore less
informative. The reverse may be true for men.)
Any
woman that ever had a man say to her, "Why aren't you smiling" know
that men view their lack of smiling negatively. In my gender differences in the
workplace and sexual harassment prevention programs, I train women not to smile
when they state an essential point or opinion so people will take them
seriously. I instruct men not to assume if they tease and joke with a woman,
and she smiles that she is pleased she may be upset and angry but may have been
raised with the gender-based admonition to cover her displeasure with a smile.
Anger
shown by the candidates will be an essential emotion for us to monitor
tonight. Anger is shown in nonverbal
research and persuasion research as the strongest persuasive emotion. Anger has
been used successfully by many leaders throughout history to show a leader's
Alpha characteristics and move a crowd.
(FYI
I am an expert in Hitler's body language, and he is the classic iconic example
of an angry speaker, though in reality, he showed a broad emotional range.)
Anger
is seen differently based on gender stereotypes. Take, for example, how many people
have retained a negative impression of Elizabeth Warren. Through a close
analysis of her speeches show a broad emotional range, and she is known as
being extremely warm in her face to face relationships because she was seen as
angry in several congressional hearing for some it overrides the reality of her
warmth and many held an unfavorable view t
Take Care,
Patti
Patti Wood, MA
The Gold Standard of
Body Language Experts
Website - http://www.PattiWood.net
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)